Daily risk briefing ·
Market crash risk on 19 February 2026: 52.6% (Risky)
vs previous day change −2.1 pts vs previous day vs 1 week earlier change −2.6 pts vs 1 week earlier
This briefing was published under methodology v1 (fixed thresholds, trend penalty, regime multiplier). Its numbers are kept as published and are not comparable with v2 readings. See the current methodology.
Summary
The Financial Composite Gauge registered 53.7% (Risky), the Overall Gauge hit 52.6% (Risky), and the Geopolitical Layer is 49.4% (Risky). Primary drivers include Iranian military fortification amid US tensions and the negative impact of US tariffs on corporate profits. These scores indicate a high-risk environment, necessitating defensive positioning as regional conflicts and trade barriers pressure global equity performance.
Geopolitical drivers
- Iran Military Fortification Amid US Tensions66Iran's construction of concrete shields at military sites signals preparation for potential conflict, directly threatening regional energy supply/prices.
- Economic Toll of Israel-Gaza War70The rising financial and human cost of the conflict increases the risk of regional spillover, affecting energy supply/prices and shipping lanes/chokepoints.
- US Tariffs Impacting Corporate Profits55Legal challenges by toy firms against US tariffs highlight the immediate impact of sanctions/trade disruption on global supply chain profitability.
Biggest 5-day market moves
- Bitcoin/USD −146.78
- Gold Spot Price +98.80
- S&P 500 Index −60.16
Chart values use methodology v2 (point-in-time backfill), so they differ from the v1 numbers published above.
Show data table
| Date | Total | Financial | Geopolitical | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | 61.0 | 58.5 | 75.2 | Risky |
| 2026-03-05 | 57.7 | 54.5 | 75.8 | Risky |
| 2026-03-04 | 62.5 | 60.3 | 75.0 | Risky |
| 2026-03-03 | 58.1 | 56.1 | 69.2 | Risky |
| 2026-03-02 | 56.4 | 54.5 | 66.5 | Risky |
| 2026-02-27 | 51.2 | 50.1 | 57.7 | Risky |
| 2026-02-26 | 47.1 | 45.6 | 55.8 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-25 | 50.8 | 50.4 | 52.7 | Risky |
| 2026-02-24 | 53.2 | 53.1 | 53.7 | Risky |
| 2026-02-23 | 47.5 | 46.6 | 52.3 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-20 | 48.0 | 49.1 | 41.6 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-19 | 46.1 | 46.9 | 41.9 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-18 | 48.8 | 49.5 | 44.9 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-17 | 49.5 | 49.4 | 50.1 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-16 | 49.5 | 49.3 | 50.9 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-13 | 50.0 | 48.5 | 58.9 | Risky |
| 2026-02-12 | 42.1 | 39.2 | 58.8 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-11 | 42.6 | 39.2 | 61.6 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-10 | 39.6 | 36.0 | 60.3 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-09 | 46.6 | 44.2 | 60.5 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-06 | 52.0 | 50.6 | 59.5 | Risky |
| 2026-02-05 | 45.8 | 42.5 | 64.0 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-04 | 42.2 | 39.0 | 60.1 | Cautious |
Not financial advice. Use the gauge as a risk thermometer, not a timing oracle.