Daily risk briefing ·
Market crash risk on 17 February 2026: 53.4% (Risky)
vs previous day change +0.7 pts vs previous day vs 1 week earlier change −1.9 pts vs 1 week earlier
This briefing was published under methodology v1 (fixed thresholds, trend penalty, regime multiplier). Its numbers are kept as published and are not comparable with v2 readings. See the current methodology.
Summary
The Financial Composite Gauge registered 52.9% (Risky), the Overall Gauge hit 53.4% (Risky), and the Geopolitical Layer is 54.8% (Risky). Primary drivers include intensified fighting ahead of Geneva Talks and Hamas's rejection of the Disarmament Ultimatum. This elevated geopolitical risk suggests a potential divergence where conflict-driven volatility outweighs the slightly lower financial risk levels.
Geopolitical drivers
- Intensified Fighting Ahead of Geneva Talks78Attacks intensifying before Geneva talks heighten uncertainty regarding energy supply and European gas price volatility.
- Hamas Rejects Disarmament Ultimatum85Hamas's rejection of disarmament terms signals a protracted conflict, maintaining high risk premiums for Red Sea shipping lanes.
- Trump Signals Indirect Iran Nuclear Deal Role53Trump's push for an Iran nuclear deal introduces potential for significant shifts in global energy supply and sanctions regimes.
Biggest 5-day market moves
- Bitcoin/USD −1995.17
- S&P 500 Index −96.13
- Gold Spot Price −65.70
Chart values use methodology v2 (point-in-time backfill), so they differ from the v1 numbers published above.
Show data table
| Date | Total | Financial | Geopolitical | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-04 | 62.5 | 60.3 | 75.0 | Risky |
| 2026-03-03 | 58.1 | 56.1 | 69.2 | Risky |
| 2026-03-02 | 56.4 | 54.5 | 66.5 | Risky |
| 2026-02-27 | 51.2 | 50.1 | 57.7 | Risky |
| 2026-02-26 | 47.1 | 45.6 | 55.8 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-25 | 50.8 | 50.4 | 52.7 | Risky |
| 2026-02-24 | 53.2 | 53.1 | 53.7 | Risky |
| 2026-02-23 | 47.5 | 46.6 | 52.3 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-20 | 48.0 | 49.1 | 41.6 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-19 | 46.1 | 46.9 | 41.9 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-18 | 48.8 | 49.5 | 44.9 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-17 | 49.5 | 49.4 | 50.1 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-16 | 49.5 | 49.3 | 50.9 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-13 | 50.0 | 48.5 | 58.9 | Risky |
| 2026-02-12 | 42.1 | 39.2 | 58.8 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-11 | 42.6 | 39.2 | 61.6 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-10 | 39.6 | 36.0 | 60.3 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-09 | 46.6 | 44.2 | 60.5 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-06 | 52.0 | 50.6 | 59.5 | Risky |
| 2026-02-05 | 45.8 | 42.5 | 64.0 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-04 | 42.2 | 39.0 | 60.1 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-03 | 35.7 | 31.5 | 59.8 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-02 | 40.9 | 37.3 | 61.5 | Cautious |
Not financial advice. Use the gauge as a risk thermometer, not a timing oracle.