Daily risk briefing ·
Market crash risk on 3 February 2026: 61.1% (Nearly Crash)
vs previous day change −0.7 pts vs previous day vs 1 week earlier change +4.6 pts vs 1 week earlier
This briefing was published under methodology v1 (fixed thresholds, trend penalty, regime multiplier). Its numbers are kept as published and are not comparable with v2 readings. See the current methodology.
Summary
The Financial Composite was 64.6% and Overall 61.1%, both Nearly Crash; the Geopolitical Layer scored 50.6% (Risky). Top drivers include renewed Russian attacks on Ukrainian cities and Moscow's aid in repelling an ISIL attack in Niger. Despite the Geopolitical layer being only Risky, both major gauges remain firmly in the high-risk Nearly Crash band.
Geopolitical drivers
- Russia renews attacks on frozen Ukrainian cities72Increased conflict intensity raises risks to European energy supply infrastructure and sustains sanctions pressure on global commodity markets.
- Moscow confirms forces helped repel ISIL attack in Niger46This confirms Russia's expanding geopolitical footprint in resource-rich Africa, increasing great-power escalation risk with Western nations over strategic access.
- Uruguay deepens ties with China despite US pressure42This heightens trade disruption risk as it challenges US regional influence, potentially leading to retaliatory trade measures affecting Latin American exports.
Biggest 5-day market moves
- Bitcoin/USD −10111.33
- Gold Spot Price −140.50
- S&P 500 Index +26.21
Chart values use methodology v2 (point-in-time backfill), so they differ from the v1 numbers published above.
Show data table
| Date | Total | Financial | Geopolitical | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-18 | 48.8 | 49.5 | 44.9 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-17 | 49.5 | 49.4 | 50.1 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-16 | 49.5 | 49.3 | 50.9 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-13 | 50.0 | 48.5 | 58.9 | Risky |
| 2026-02-12 | 42.1 | 39.2 | 58.8 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-11 | 42.6 | 39.2 | 61.6 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-10 | 39.6 | 36.0 | 60.3 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-09 | 46.6 | 44.2 | 60.5 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-06 | 52.0 | 50.6 | 59.5 | Risky |
| 2026-02-05 | 45.8 | 42.5 | 64.0 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-04 | 42.2 | 39.0 | 60.1 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-03 | 35.7 | 31.5 | 59.8 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-02 | 40.9 | 37.3 | 61.5 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-30 | 36.8 | 31.9 | 64.2 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-29 | 34.2 | 29.0 | 63.6 | Safe |
| 2026-01-28 | 32.6 | 26.9 | 64.6 | Safe |
| 2026-01-27 | 35.0 | 29.7 | 65.4 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-26 | 36.3 | 31.7 | 62.4 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-23 | 35.0 | 30.3 | 61.2 | Safe |
| 2026-01-22 | 39.8 | 36.6 | 58.3 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-21 | 46.6 | 44.0 | 61.1 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-20 | 36.4 | 32.1 | 61.3 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-19 | 34.6 | 29.7 | 62.2 | Safe |
Not financial advice. Use the gauge as a risk thermometer, not a timing oracle.