Daily risk briefing ·
Market crash risk on 29 January 2026: 61.4% (Nearly Crash)
vs previous day change +4.5 pts vs previous day vs 1 week earlier change +0.6 pts vs 1 week earlier
This briefing was published under methodology v1 (fixed thresholds, trend penalty, regime multiplier). Its numbers are kept as published and are not comparable with v2 readings. See the current methodology.
Summary
The Financial Composite Gauge registered 64.2% (Nearly Crash), the Overall Gauge hit 61.4% (Nearly Crash), and the Geopolitical Layer is 53.0% (Risky).
Geopolitical risk is driven by China's warning to the US and instability in the global economic order.
High systemic financial stress levels currently exceed the immediate geopolitical threat assessment.
Geopolitical drivers
- China warns US against 'military adventurism' amid Iran tensions90This increases the risk of great-power escalation and directly threatens energy supply and shipping lanes in the Middle East, driving up crude oil prices.
- Questioning the stability of the global economic order46Systemic questioning of global trade norms increases long-term uncertainty regarding tariffs, trade disruption, and the stability of supply chains.
- Heavy gunfire and blasts near airport in Niger capital42Renewed political instability and conflict risk in Niger threaten regional security and could disrupt uranium and other resource supply chains originating from West Africa.
Biggest 5-day market moves
- Bitcoin/USD −1525.31
- Gold Spot Price +647.50
- S&P 500 Index +102.41
Chart values use methodology v2 (point-in-time backfill), so they differ from the v1 numbers published above.
Show data table
| Date | Total | Financial | Geopolitical | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-13 | 50.0 | 48.5 | 58.9 | Risky |
| 2026-02-12 | 42.1 | 39.2 | 58.8 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-11 | 42.6 | 39.2 | 61.6 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-10 | 39.6 | 36.0 | 60.3 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-09 | 46.6 | 44.2 | 60.5 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-06 | 52.0 | 50.6 | 59.5 | Risky |
| 2026-02-05 | 45.8 | 42.5 | 64.0 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-04 | 42.2 | 39.0 | 60.1 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-03 | 35.7 | 31.5 | 59.8 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-02 | 40.9 | 37.3 | 61.5 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-30 | 36.8 | 31.9 | 64.2 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-29 | 34.2 | 29.0 | 63.6 | Safe |
| 2026-01-28 | 32.6 | 26.9 | 64.6 | Safe |
| 2026-01-27 | 35.0 | 29.7 | 65.4 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-26 | 36.3 | 31.7 | 62.4 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-23 | 35.0 | 30.3 | 61.2 | Safe |
| 2026-01-22 | 39.8 | 36.6 | 58.3 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-21 | 46.6 | 44.0 | 61.1 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-20 | 36.4 | 32.1 | 61.3 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-19 | 34.6 | 29.7 | 62.2 | Safe |
| 2026-01-16 | 34.4 | 29.7 | 60.5 | Safe |
| 2026-01-15 | 44.4 | 35.1 | 96.9 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-14 | 42.6 | 32.9 | 97.7 | Cautious |
Not financial advice. Use the gauge as a risk thermometer, not a timing oracle.