Daily risk briefing ·
Market crash risk on 30 January 2026: 61.2% (Nearly Crash)
vs previous day change −0.2 pts vs previous day vs 1 week earlier change +3.7 pts vs 1 week earlier
This briefing was published under methodology v1 (fixed thresholds, trend penalty, regime multiplier). Its numbers are kept as published and are not comparable with v2 readings. See the current methodology.
Summary
The Financial Composite Gauge registered 63.0% (Nearly Crash), the Overall Gauge hit 61.2% (Nearly Crash), and the Geopolitical Layer is 55.9% (Risky).
Intensifying US-Iran war fears and Panama's ruling against Chinese port control drove the geopolitical layer.
The extreme "Nearly Crash" readings mandate defensive positioning and heightened vigilance for risk-off flows.
Geopolitical drivers
- US-Iran war fears intensify despite diplomatic talks95The threat of military conflict raises the risk premium on oil and threatens the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, severely impacting global energy supply.
- Panama court rules Chinese control of canal ports unconstitutional68This ruling introduces uncertainty over the management of a critical global shipping chokepoint, potentially increasing trade disruption and logistics costs.
- Trump threatens tariffs on Canadian planes and nations selling oil to Cuba64The threat of new tariffs signals major trade disruption risk for North American supply chains and escalates sanctions enforcement against oil trade partners.
Biggest 5-day market moves
- Bitcoin/USD −7054.35
- Gold Spot Price +106.90
- S&P 500 Index +55.66
Chart values use methodology v2 (point-in-time backfill), so they differ from the v1 numbers published above.
Show data table
| Date | Total | Financial | Geopolitical | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-13 | 50.0 | 48.5 | 58.9 | Risky |
| 2026-02-12 | 42.1 | 39.2 | 58.8 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-11 | 42.6 | 39.2 | 61.6 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-10 | 39.6 | 36.0 | 60.3 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-09 | 46.6 | 44.2 | 60.5 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-06 | 52.0 | 50.6 | 59.5 | Risky |
| 2026-02-05 | 45.8 | 42.5 | 64.0 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-04 | 42.2 | 39.0 | 60.1 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-03 | 35.7 | 31.5 | 59.8 | Cautious |
| 2026-02-02 | 40.9 | 37.3 | 61.5 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-30 | 36.8 | 31.9 | 64.2 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-29 | 34.2 | 29.0 | 63.6 | Safe |
| 2026-01-28 | 32.6 | 26.9 | 64.6 | Safe |
| 2026-01-27 | 35.0 | 29.7 | 65.4 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-26 | 36.3 | 31.7 | 62.4 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-23 | 35.0 | 30.3 | 61.2 | Safe |
| 2026-01-22 | 39.8 | 36.6 | 58.3 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-21 | 46.6 | 44.0 | 61.1 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-20 | 36.4 | 32.1 | 61.3 | Cautious |
| 2026-01-19 | 34.6 | 29.7 | 62.2 | Safe |
| 2026-01-16 | 34.4 | 29.7 | 60.5 | Safe |
| 2026-01-15 | 44.4 | 35.1 | 96.9 | Cautious |
Not financial advice. Use the gauge as a risk thermometer, not a timing oracle.